Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Adult Income

Benchmarks

Task NameDataset NameSOTA ResultTrend
ClassificationAdult Income 1996 (train and test)
Demographic Parity1
24
ClassificationAdult Income (test)
Accuracy0.8593
21
GRN AttackAdult Income
MSE0.231
16
Counterfactual RecourseAdult Income
Cost0.03
15
ClassificationAdult Income
LR Accuracy87
13
Fair Decision MakingAdult Income Gender 11 (test)
Total Interventions1.6
9
Fair Decision MakingAdult Income Race 11 (test)
Total Interventions5.8
9
Group FairnessAdult Income Gender
Demographic Parity0.004
9
Group FairnessAdult Income Race
Demographic Parity0.01
9
ClassificationAdult Income 2 classes
Accuracy85.25
9
Model ReconstructionAdult Income
Average Fidelity96
9
Gradient Reconstruction AttackAdult Income Attack Strength = 25% (test)
Reconstruction MSE0.227
8
ClassificationAdult Income
AUC0.907
7
Fair ClassificationAdult Income (5-fold)
Pareto Non-Dominance Count5
7
Tabular Data SynthesisAdult Income
Violation Rate0
7
ClassificationAdult Income
EO Gap0.061
7
Machine LearningAdult Income
F1 Score82.07
7
Synthetic Data GenerationAdult Income (test)
Discriminator Accuracy96.92
7
Tabular ClassificationAdult Income
TRTR AUROC0.9063
6
Robustness CertificationAdult Income (AI) (test)
Certification Rate (0.05% Bias)98.8
6
Counterfactual Explanation GenerationAdult Income Protocol A B=4
Sparsity89.26
5
Data SynthesisAdult Income
Repetition Rate0
5
ClassificationAdult Income
AUC90
4
Counterfactual ExplanationAdult Income Protocol B, B=64
Validity100
4
Outsourced Data Anonymization VerificationAdult Income Approximate adversary
Metric-
0
Showing 25 of 28 rows