Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

CEC

Benchmarks

Task NameDataset NameSOTA ResultTrend
Numerical OptimizationCEC 2014
Mean Fitness Error0
120
Black-box OptimizationCEC 30D 2017
Mean Objective Value0
90
Function OptimizationCEC 100D 2017
Mean Value2,093.826
80
Numerical OptimizationCEC 50 dimensions 2017
Mean Objective Value0
37
Dynamic Multi-objective OptimizationCEC DF2 2018
MHV0.8368
32
Numerical OptimizationCEC D=10 2022
Friedman Rank1
30
Continuous OptimizationCEC D=30 2014
Rank3.83
20
Global OptimizationCEC Functions F01-F30 D=50 2014
Rank3.53
19
Numerical OptimizationCEC D=100 F01-F30 2014
Rank4.27
19
Numerical OptimizationCEC F10 2022
Average Value1.786
18
Numerical OptimizationCEC F3 2022
Average Score6
18
Numerical OptimizationCEC F2 2022
Average1.334
18
Numerical OptimizationCEC F1 2022
Average Value3
18
Dynamic Multi-objective OptimizationCEC DF3 2018
MHV Score50.2
16
Numerical OptimizationCEC D=20 2022
Friedman Rank3.17
15
Global OptimizationCEC 30D 2017
Mean Value300
14
Global OptimizationCEC 20D 2022
FM-Rank (Friedman Ranking)2.75
14
Global OptimizationCEC C12 2022
Mean Objective Value2,880
14
Global OptimizationCEC2022 C11
Mean Result6,180
14
Global OptimizationCEC C10 2022
Mean Value2,490
14
Global OptimizationCEC C9 2022
Mean Score2,470
14
Global OptimizationCEC C8 2022
Mean Objective Value2,220
14
Global OptimizationCEC 2022 C7
Mean Value (C7)2,020
14
Global OptimizationCEC C6 2022
Mean Score1,800
14
Global OptimizationCEC C5 2022
Mean900
14
Showing 25 of 290 rows
...