CWRU
Benchmarks
| Task Name | Dataset Name | SOTA Result | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anomaly Detection | CWRU | AUC100 | 12 | |
| Fault diagnosis | CWRU dataset | Accuracy98.5 | 11 | |
| Bearing Fault Detection | CWRU | Inference Time (s)0.044 | 9 | |
| OOD Detection | CWRU Scenario No.1 (test) | OOD Uncertainty Score98 | 8 | |
| Bearing fault diagnosis | CWRU (test) | F1-score99.5 | 8 | |
| Cross-domain open-set fault diagnosis | CWRU (test) | Performance Metric P194.77 | 7 | |
| Intelligent Fault Diagnosis | CWRU | Test Accuracy99.5 | 6 | |
| Fault Diagnosis | CWRU 0 dB SNR | W1 Score78.26 | 6 | |
| Fault Diagnosis | CWRU 10 dB SNR | W183.72 | 6 | |
| Bearing Fault Diagnosis | CWRU | F1 Score99.48 | 6 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CWRU Average | OOD Utility Transfer (UT)89.1 | 4 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CWRU Scenario No.5 | OOD UT Score97.1 | 4 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CWRU Scenario No.4 | OOD Utility Transfer (UT)96.2 | 4 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CWRU Scenario No.3 | OOD Utility Transfer (UT)90.3 | 4 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CWRU Scenario No.2 | OOD Utility Transfer (UT)83.8 | 4 | |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | CWRU Scenario No.0 | OOD Utility Transfer (UT)82.9 | 4 | |
| Fault Diagnosis | CWRU dataset | Training Time239.55 | 4 | |
| OOD Detection | CWRU Average across Scenarios (test) | OOD UT97.5 | 4 | |
| OOD Detection | CWRU Scenario No.5 (test) | OOD Utility Transfer99.6 | 4 | |
| OOD Detection | CWRU Scenario No.4 (test) | OOD Utility Transfer (%)100 | 4 | |
| OOD Detection | CWRU Scenario No.3 (test) | OOD UT Score99.4 | 4 | |
| OOD Detection | CWRU Scenario No.2 (test) | OOD Utility Transfer (UT)98.7 | 4 | |
| OOD Detection | CWRU Scenario No.0 (test) | Utility Transfer (OOD -> ID)96.9 | 4 | |
| Fault Diagnosis | CWRU (test) | Test Accuracy99.5 | 2 |
Showing 24 of 24 rows