| Task Name | Dataset Name | SOTA Result | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Regression | parkinsons | NCIW0.25 | 22 | |
| Counterfactual Explanation Generation | Parkinsons | R1 | 20 | |
| Regression | Parkinsons | RMSE0.0397 | 16 | |
| Classification | parkinsons UCI KEEL (test) | Accuracy93.1 | 12 | |
| Regression | parkinsons | Interval Score Loss14.486 | 11 | |
| Regression | parkinsons | Quantile Loss0.181 | 11 | |
| Regression | parkinsons | PICP97 | 11 | |
| Classification | Parkinsons 80% (train) | VI Score82 | 8 | |
| Classification | Parkinsons UCI (test 20%) | VI9.06 | 8 | |
| Denoising | Parkinsons | Improvement (%)82.8 | 8 | |
| Downstream ML Utility | Parkinsons | F1-score96.6 | 8 | |
| Tabular Synthetic Data Generation | Parkinsons | KS Statistic0.034 | 8 | |
| Active Learning | Parkinsons | AULC0.629 | 8 | |
| Classification | Parkinsons | ROC AUC0.958 | 8 | |
| Tabular Classification | Parkinsons | Cohen's Kappa0.772 | 8 | |
| Tabular Data Generation | Parkinsons | Peak GPU Memory Usage (GB)2.1 | 7 | |
| Regression | Parkinsons Total (5-fold CV) | RMSE1.86 | 7 | |
| Classification | UCI Parkinsons (train) | Accuracy94.49 | 6 | |
| Conditional Density Estimation | Parkinsons 2D (test) | Negative Log-Likelihood0.36 | 6 | |
| Regression | Parkinsons | Mean MSE78.6647 | 5 | |
| Regression | parkinsons | R2 Score0.9909 | 4 | |
| Classification | parkinsons (80%-20% train-test) | Accuracy100 | 4 | |
| Classification | Parkinsons (5-fold CV) | Accuracy94.9 | 2 | |
| Model Stealing | Parkinsons | Number of Queries296 | 2 | |
| Regression | parkinsons | NCIW8.8 | 2 |