Simulated GWAS
Benchmarks
| Task Name | Dataset Name | SOTA Result | Trend | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feature Selection | Simulated GWAS 50,000 SNPs 25 Significant SNPs Low LD Sample size 50 | True Positives15 | 3 | |
| Feature Selection | Simulated GWAS (50,000 SNPs, 25 Significant SNPs, Mixed LD, Sample size 50) | TP Count16 | 3 | |
| Feature Selection | Simulated GWAS 50,000 SNPs 25 Significant SNPs High LD (Sample size 50) | Correct Identifications Count19 | 3 | |
| Feature Selection | Simulated GWAS 50,000 SNPs 25 Significant SNPs Low LD Sample size 150 | Correct Identifications25 | 3 | |
| Feature Selection | Simulated GWAS 50,000 SNPs 25 Significant SNPs Mixed LD Sample size 150 | Correctly Identified SNPs24 | 3 | |
| Feature Selection | Simulated GWAS 50,000 SNPs 25 Significant SNPs High LD Sample size 150 | True Positives25 | 3 | |
| Sparse regression | Simulated GWAS Low LD 50,000 SNPs, 25 significant SNPs (Sample size 100) | Correct Identifications Count233.07 | 3 | |
| Sparse regression | Simulated GWAS Mixed LD 50,000 SNPs, 25 significant SNPs (Sample size 100) | Correct Identifications242.03 | 3 | |
| Sparse regression | Simulated GWAS High LD 50,000 SNPs, 25 significant SNPs (Sample size 100) | True Positives251.52 | 3 | |
| Sparse regression | Simulated GWAS Low LD 50,000 SNPs, 25 significant SNPs (Sample size 1000) | True Positives Count250.51 | 3 | |
| Sparse regression | Simulated GWAS Mixed LD 50,000 SNPs, 25 significant SNPs (Sample size 1000) | Correct Identification Rate25,000 | 3 | |
| Sparse regression | Simulated GWAS High LD 50,000 SNPs, 25 significant SNPs (Sample size 1000) | True Positives Rate (TP Rate)25,000 | 3 |
Showing 12 of 12 rows