Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Stanford Dogs

Benchmarks

Task NameDataset NameSOTA ResultTrend
Image ClassificationStanford Dogs
Accuracy93.8
130
Fine-grained Image ClassificationStanford Dogs (test)
Accuracy97.3
117
Image ClassificationStanford Dogs (test)
Top-1 Acc92.4
85
Fine-Grained Visual ClassificationStanford Dogs (test)
Top-1 Acc92
52
Fine-Grained Visual CategorizationStanford Dogs
Accuracy97.1
51
Concept ErasureStanford Dogs (test)
Aer100
21
Image ClassificationStanford Dogs (test)
1-shot Accuracy67.56
21
Fine-grained ClassificationStanford Dogs 40% symmetric noise (test)
Best Accuracy79.12
20
Fine-grained ClassificationStanford Dogs 20% symmetric noise (test)
Best Accuracy81.4
20
Fine-grained Image ClassificationStanford Dogs
Score8.8
18
Image ClassificationStanford Dogs
Clean Accuracy92.02
18
Few-shot ClassificationStanford Dogs
Accuracy81.77
15
Image ClassificationStanford Dogs 5-way 5-shot (test)
Accuracy91.35
13
Image ClassificationStanford Dogs 5-way 2-shot
Accuracy86.95
13
Fine-grained ClassificationStanf. Dogs (test)
Top-1 Error7.1
10
Class Incremental LearningStanford Dogs 10 Tasks
Average Accuracy92.64
9
Image ClassificationStanford Dogs 1.0 (test)
CLIP Score76.9
8
Weakly Supervised Object LocalizationStanford-Dogs (test)
Localization Accuracy86.4
7
Fine-grained 5-way classificationStanford Dogs
1-shot Acc46.98
7
Metric correlation with human assessment of privacy leakageStanford Dogs (test)
Spearman Correlation0.4782
6
Unsupervised Foreground ExtractionStanford Dogs (test)
mIoU86.2
5
Generalization gap predictionStanford Dogs
Generalization Gap Prediction Error27
5
Fine-grained object category discoveryStanford Dogs (test)
NMI0.233
5
Image GenerationStanford Dogs (test)
IS46.92
5
Explanation GenerationStanford Dogs
EE1
4
Showing 25 of 31 rows