Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Wisconsin

Benchmarks

Task NameDataset NameSOTA ResultTrend
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Accuracy96
627
Node classificationWisconsin (test)
Mean Accuracy94.89
239
Node ClassificationWisconsin (48/32/20)
Mean Accuracy92.54
66
Node ClassificationWisconsin (60%/20%/20%)
Test Accuracy98
43
Node ClassificationWisconsin H=0.19
Accuracy82.15
39
Node Classification Robustness CertificationWisconsin
Time (s) (All Instances)0.01
36
Classificationwisconsin
Accuracy97.5
35
node classificationwisconsin
Micro F112.8
32
Node ClassificationWisconsin standard (test)
Accuracy87.65
23
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Count65
22
Node ClassificationWisconsin (10 splits)
Accuracy89.41
22
Node ClassificationWisconsin (fixed)
Accuracy88.43
21
Node classificationWisconsin (Wis.)
Accuracy87.6
20
Link PredictionWisconsin Attributed
AUC82.5
18
Node clusteringWisconsin (test)
Conductance0.52
15
Classificationwisconsin 25% feature noise
Accuracy97
14
Classificationwisconsin
F1 Score97.7
14
Node ClassificationWisconsin original (test)
Accuracy85.01
14
Graph ClusteringWisconsin
Accuracy74.1
13
ExplainabilityWisconsin
Faithfulness (KL distance)0.006
12
Few-shot Graph Learning ExplainabilityWisconsin (3% labeling ratio)
Explainability Performance6.75
12
Few-shot Graph Learning ExplainabilityWisconsin (2% labeling ratio)
Explainability Performance2.29
12
Node ClassificationWisconsin heterophilic (test)
Accuracy82.31
12
Node classificationWisconsin heterophilous (official)
Accuracy82.9
11
Link PredictionWisconsin (test)
Accuracy71.77
11
Showing 25 of 50 rows