Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Wisconsin

Benchmarks

Task NameDataset NameSOTA ResultTrend
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Accuracy96
410
Node classificationWisconsin (test)
Mean Accuracy94.89
198
Node ClassificationWisconsin (48/32/20)
Mean Accuracy92.54
50
Node ClassificationWisconsin H=0.19
Accuracy82.15
39
node classificationwisconsin
Micro F112.8
32
Node ClassificationWisconsin (60%/20%/20%)
Test Accuracy97
28
Node ClassificationWisconsin standard (test)
Accuracy87.65
23
Node ClassificationWisconsin (10 splits)
Accuracy89.41
22
Node ClassificationWisconsin (fixed)
Accuracy88.43
21
Node classificationWisconsin (Wis.)
Accuracy87.6
20
Link PredictionWisconsin Attributed
AUC82.5
18
Node clusteringWisconsin (test)
Conductance0.52
15
Node ClassificationWisconsin original (test)
Accuracy85.01
14
Node ClassificationWisconsin heterophilic (test)
Accuracy82.31
12
Link PredictionWisconsin (test)
Accuracy71.77
11
Node ClassificationWisconsin full-supervised
Accuracy81.57
11
Node ClassificationWisconsin Heterophilic (10 train val test splits)
Accuracy87.65
8
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Avg Model Evaluations5
7
Classificationwisconsin
Accuracy97.5
7
Classificationwis (Wisconsin) (test)
Average Test Error Rate2.4
7
Node ClassificationWisconsin perturbed (test)
Accuracy59.25
6
Node ClassificationWisconsin clean (test)
Accuracy60.5
6
Community DetectionWisconsin
Precision40
5
Counterfactual Explanation Generationwisconsin
Validity1
4
Outlier Explanationwisconsin
Avg Run Time (s)0.0026
4
Showing 25 of 27 rows