Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Leveraging power grid topology in machine learning assisted optimal power flow

About

Machine learning assisted optimal power flow (OPF) aims to reduce the computational complexity of these non-linear and non-convex constrained optimization problems by consigning expensive (online) optimization to offline training. The majority of work in this area typically employs fully connected neural networks (FCNN). However, recently convolutional (CNN) and graph (GNN) neural networks have also been investigated, in effort to exploit topological information within the power grid. Although promising results have been obtained, there lacks a systematic comparison between these architectures throughout literature. Accordingly, we introduce a concise framework for generalizing methods for machine learning assisted OPF and assess the performance of a variety of FCNN, CNN and GNN models for two fundamental approaches in this domain: regression (predicting optimal generator set-points) and classification (predicting the active set of constraints). For several synthetic power grids with interconnected utilities, we show that locality properties between feature and target variables are scarce and subsequently demonstrate marginal utility of applying CNN and GNN architectures compared to FCNN for a fixed grid topology. However, with variable topology (for instance, modeling transmission line contingency), GNN models are able to straightforwardly take the change of topological information into account and outperform both FCNN and CNN models.

Thomas Falconer, Letif Mones• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Optimal Power Flow predictionOPFData (full topology)
Voltage Angle Error0.32
22
Optimal Power Flow predictionDataKit full topology
Voltage Angle (theta)7
22
Optimal Power Flow predictionPGLearn full topology
Theta Error0.26
16
Optimal Power FlowPGLearn 14-IEEE (test)
Avg Constraint Violation Sij(+)0.00e+0
4
Optimal Power FlowPGLearn 57-IEEE (test)
Avg Constraint Violation Sij(+) (x10^-4 p.u.)0.00e+0
4
Optimal Power FlowPGLearn 118-IEEE (test)
Avg Constraint Violation Sij(+) (x10^-4 p.u.)2
4
Optimal Power FlowGridFM-datakit 14-IEEE
Avg Constraint Violation (Sij+)0.00e+0
4
Optimal Power FlowGridFM-datakit 30-IEEE
Avg Constraint Violation (Sij+)0.2
4
Optimal Power FlowGridFM-datakit 57-IEEE
Avg Constraint Violation (Sij+)0.00e+0
4
Optimal Power Flow predictionOPFData 14-IEEE
Average Constraint Violation Sij(+)0.00e+0
4
Showing 10 of 19 rows

Other info

Follow for update