Deep learning the slow modes for rare events sampling
About
The development of enhanced sampling methods has greatly extended the scope of atomistic simulations, allowing long-time phenomena to be studied with accessible computational resources. Many such methods rely on the identification of an appropriate set of collective variables. These are meant to describe the system's modes that most slowly approach equilibrium. Once identified, the equilibration of these modes is accelerated by the enhanced sampling method of choice. An attractive way of determining the collective variables is to relate them to the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the transfer operator. Unfortunately, this requires knowing the long-term dynamics of the system beforehand, which is generally not available. However, we have recently shown that it is indeed possible to determine efficient collective variables starting from biased simulations. In this paper, we bring the power of machine learning and the efficiency of the recently developed on-the-fly probability enhanced sampling method to bear on this approach. The result is a powerful and robust algorithm that, given an initial enhanced sampling simulation performed with trial collective variables or generalized ensembles, extracts transfer operator eigenfunctions using a neural network ansatz and then accelerates them to promote sampling of rare events. To illustrate the generality of this approach we apply it to several systems, ranging from the conformational transition of a small molecule to the folding of a mini-protein and the study of materials crystallization.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dynamic content preservation | BBA DESRES trajectory data | VAMP-11.9898 | 4 | |
| State discrimination analysis | Chignolin Folded state, DESRES trajectory | Average MLCV85 | 4 | |
| State discrimination analysis | Chignolin Unfolded state, DESRES trajectory | Average MLCV-0.49 | 4 | |
| Dynamic content preservation | Chignolin DESRES trajectory data | VAMP-11.9803 | 4 | |
| State discrimination analysis | Trp-cage Unfolded state DESRES trajectory | Average MLCV-0.74 | 4 | |
| State discrimination analysis | BBA Unfolded state, DESRES trajectory | Average MLCV-0.51 | 4 | |
| Dynamic content preservation | Trp-cage DESRES trajectory data | VAMP-11.992 | 4 | |
| State discrimination analysis | BBA Folded state, DESRES trajectory | Average MLCV0.75 | 4 | |
| Correlation analysis with committor function | Chignolin | Pearson Corr.0.682 | 4 | |
| State discrimination analysis | Trp-cage Folded state, DESRES trajectory | Average MLCV70 | 4 |