Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Deep learning the slow modes for rare events sampling

About

The development of enhanced sampling methods has greatly extended the scope of atomistic simulations, allowing long-time phenomena to be studied with accessible computational resources. Many such methods rely on the identification of an appropriate set of collective variables. These are meant to describe the system's modes that most slowly approach equilibrium. Once identified, the equilibration of these modes is accelerated by the enhanced sampling method of choice. An attractive way of determining the collective variables is to relate them to the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the transfer operator. Unfortunately, this requires knowing the long-term dynamics of the system beforehand, which is generally not available. However, we have recently shown that it is indeed possible to determine efficient collective variables starting from biased simulations. In this paper, we bring the power of machine learning and the efficiency of the recently developed on-the-fly probability enhanced sampling method to bear on this approach. The result is a powerful and robust algorithm that, given an initial enhanced sampling simulation performed with trial collective variables or generalized ensembles, extracts transfer operator eigenfunctions using a neural network ansatz and then accelerates them to promote sampling of rare events. To illustrate the generality of this approach we apply it to several systems, ranging from the conformational transition of a small molecule to the folding of a mini-protein and the study of materials crystallization.

Luigi Bonati, GiovanniMaria Piccini, Michele Parrinello• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Dynamic content preservationBBA DESRES trajectory data
VAMP-11.9898
4
State discrimination analysisChignolin Folded state, DESRES trajectory
Average MLCV85
4
State discrimination analysisChignolin Unfolded state, DESRES trajectory
Average MLCV-0.49
4
Dynamic content preservationChignolin DESRES trajectory data
VAMP-11.9803
4
State discrimination analysisTrp-cage Unfolded state DESRES trajectory
Average MLCV-0.74
4
State discrimination analysisBBA Unfolded state, DESRES trajectory
Average MLCV-0.51
4
Dynamic content preservationTrp-cage DESRES trajectory data
VAMP-11.992
4
State discrimination analysisBBA Folded state, DESRES trajectory
Average MLCV0.75
4
Correlation analysis with committor functionChignolin
Pearson Corr.0.682
4
State discrimination analysisTrp-cage Folded state, DESRES trajectory
Average MLCV70
4
Showing 10 of 16 rows

Other info

Follow for update