Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Residual-based attention and connection to information bottleneck theory in PINNs

About

Driven by the need for more efficient and seamless integration of physical models and data, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have seen a surge of interest in recent years. However, ensuring the reliability of their convergence and accuracy remains a challenge. In this work, we propose an efficient, gradient-less weighting scheme for PINNs, that accelerates the convergence of dynamic or static systems. This simple yet effective attention mechanism is a function of the evolving cumulative residuals and aims to make the optimizer aware of problematic regions at no extra computational cost or adversarial learning. We illustrate that this general method consistently achieves a relative $L^{2}$ error of the order of $10^{-5}$ using standard optimizers on typical benchmark cases of the literature. Furthermore, by investigating the evolution of weights during training, we identify two distinct learning phases reminiscent of the fitting and diffusion phases proposed by the information bottleneck (IB) theory. Subsequent gradient analysis supports this hypothesis by aligning the transition from high to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with the transition from fitting to diffusion regimes of the adopted weights. This novel correlation between PINNs and IB theory could open future possibilities for understanding the underlying mechanisms behind the training and stability of PINNs and, more broadly, of neural operators.

Sokratis J. Anagnostopoulos, Juan Diego Toscano, Nikolaos Stergiopulos, George Em Karniadakis• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
PDE solvingNavier-Stokes
Relative L2 Loss4.86
47
PDE solvingBurgers
Relative L2 Error4.17e-4
33
PDE solvingAllen-Cahn equation
L2 Relative Error7.34e-5
25
PDE solvingHeat PDE
Relative L2 Error0.0689
24
PDE solvingDiffusion PDE
Relative L2 Error1.29e-4
24
PDE solvingReaction PDE
Relative L2 Error0.945
16
PDE solvingWave
Relative L2 Error0.0016
16
PDE solvingConvection
Relative L2 Error0.832
14
PDE solvingWave PDE
Relative L2 Error0.0019
11
PDE solvingNon-homogeneous heat equation
L2 Relative Error3.22
8
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update