Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Higher-order Graph Convolutional Network with Flower-Petals Laplacians on Simplicial Complexes

About

Despite the recent successes of vanilla Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) on various tasks, their foundation on pairwise networks inherently limits their capacity to discern latent higher-order interactions in complex systems. To bridge this capability gap, we propose a novel approach exploiting the rich mathematical theory of simplicial complexes (SCs) - a robust tool for modeling higher-order interactions. Current SC-based GNNs are burdened by high complexity and rigidity, and quantifying higher-order interaction strengths remains challenging. Innovatively, we present a higher-order Flower-Petals (FP) model, incorporating FP Laplacians into SCs. Further, we introduce a Higher-order Graph Convolutional Network (HiGCN) grounded in FP Laplacians, capable of discerning intrinsic features across varying topological scales. By employing learnable graph filters, a parameter group within each FP Laplacian domain, we can identify diverse patterns where the filters' weights serve as a quantifiable measure of higher-order interaction strengths. The theoretical underpinnings of HiGCN's advanced expressiveness are rigorously demonstrated. Additionally, our empirical investigations reveal that the proposed model accomplishes state-of-the-art performance on a range of graph tasks and provides a scalable and flexible solution to explore higher-order interactions in graphs. Codes and datasets are available at https://github.com/Yiminghh/HiGCN.

Yiming Huang, Yujie Zeng, Qiang Wu, Linyuan L\"u• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCiteseer
Accuracy81.12
1037
Node ClassificationCora (test)
Mean Accuracy89.23
951
Node ClassificationPubmed
Accuracy89.95
865
Node ClassificationWisconsin
Accuracy94.99
864
Node ClassificationTexas
Accuracy0.9245
801
Node ClassificationChameleon (test)
Mean Accuracy68.47
335
Node ClassificationTexas (test)
Mean Accuracy92.15
312
Node ClassificationSquirrel (test)
Mean Accuracy51.86
301
Node ClassificationActor (test)
Mean Accuracy0.4181
286
Node ClassificationWisconsin (test)
Mean Accuracy94.89
279
Showing 10 of 20 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update