Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Learning Smooth and Expressive Interatomic Potentials for Physical Property Prediction

About

Machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) have become increasingly effective at approximating quantum mechanical calculations at a fraction of the computational cost. However, lower errors on held out test sets do not always translate to improved results on downstream physical property prediction tasks. In this paper, we propose testing MLIPs on their practical ability to conserve energy during molecular dynamic simulations. If passed, improved correlations are found between test errors and their performance on physical property prediction tasks. We identify choices which may lead to models failing this test, and use these observations to improve upon highly-expressive models. The resulting model, eSEN, provides state-of-the-art results on a range of physical property prediction tasks, including materials stability prediction, thermal conductivity prediction, and phonon calculations.

Xiang Fu, Brandon M. Wood, Luis Barroso-Luque, Daniel S. Levine, Meng Gao, Misko Dzamba, C. Lawrence Zitnick• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Stability predictionMatbench-Discovery unique structure prototypes
F1 Score83.1
26
Simulation Speed EstimationStandard periodic atomic system ≈ 50 neighbors per atom, 6Å cutoff
Steps per Second8
23
Energy, Force, and Stress PredictionOMat24 (val)
Energy per Atom10.7
21
Molecular energy predictionOMol25 (test)
Average Rank4.14
17
Material DiscoveryMatbench Discovery MPtrj
F1 Score83.1
12
Material DiscoveryMatbench-Discovery non-compliant full (test)
F1 Score90.2
10
Material DiscoveryMatbench-Discovery 10k most stable
F1 Score97.1
10
Energy PredictionDiels-Alder reaction
MAE (mHa)1.15
8
Energy PredictionQM7 (test)
MAE (mHa)0.13
8
Materials Stability PredictionMatbench-Discovery
F1 Score92.5
8
Showing 10 of 31 rows

Other info

Follow for update