Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Reformulating Neural Operators in $d+1$ Dimensions for Embedding Evolution

About

Neural Operators (NOs) are powerful architectures for learning mappings between function spaces. While most advances focus on refining kernel parameterizations over the $d$-dimensional physical domain, the evolution of lifted embeddings remains underexplored, which often drives models toward computationally expensive embedding-scaling designs to improve approximation. In this paper, we introduce an auxiliary function dimension that models embedding evolution in operator form, thereby reformulating the NO pipeline in $d+1$ dimensions. We instantiate this framework via Fourier-based operators acting jointly on the physical and auxiliary domains, yielding a basis-diversified auxiliary evolution module as an alternative to brute-force embedding scaling. Across more than ten increasingly challenging benchmarks, ranging from the 1D heat equation to the highly nonlinear 3D Rayleigh-Taylor instability, our model consistently achieves the lowest relative $L_2$ error among the evaluated baselines. Crucially, this advantage is empirically supported by (1) controlled budget-aware comparisons against scaled and ablated baselines; (2) robustness under mixed-resolution training and super-resolution inference; and (3) zero-shot generalization to unseen temporal regimes. In addition, we present a broader set of design choices for lifting and recovery operators, demonstrating their impact on our model's predictive performance.

Haoze Song, Zhihao Li, Xiaobo Zhang, Zecheng Gan, Zhilu Lai, Wei Wang• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Long-term forecasting2D Navier-Stokes
Relative L2 Error (Rollout)8.077
16
2d Darcy Flow2D Darcy Flow
Relative L2 Error0.55
12
Conservation-law dynamics predictionShallow Water
Relative L2 Error0.0027
11
Operator learning1D Burgers
Relative L2 Error5.475
11
Operator learning2D Strain
Relative L2 Error4.635
4
Operator learning2D Darcy
Rel. L2 Error5.555
4
Operator learning2D Gray-Scott
Relative L2 Error1.298
4
Operator learning3D Comp. NS
Relative L2 Error0.0238
4
Operator learning3D RT
Relative L2 Error0.0447
4
Operator learning2D Stress
Relative L2 Error4.724
4
Showing 10 of 12 rows

Other info

Follow for update