Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Sparse and stable Markowitz portfolios

About

We consider the problem of portfolio selection within the classical Markowitz mean-variance framework, reformulated as a constrained least-squares regression problem. We propose to add to the objective function a penalty proportional to the sum of the absolute values of the portfolio weights. This penalty regularizes (stabilizes) the optimization problem, encourages sparse portfolios (i.e. portfolios with only few active positions), and allows to account for transaction costs. Our approach recovers as special cases the no-short-positions portfolios, but does allow for short positions in limited number. We implement this methodology on two benchmark data sets constructed by Fama and French. Using only a modest amount of training data, we construct portfolios whose out-of-sample performance, as measured by Sharpe ratio, is consistently and significantly better than that of the naive evenly-weighted portfolio which constitutes, as shown in recent literature, a very tough benchmark.

Joshua Brodie, Ingrid Daubechies, Christine De Mol, Domenico Giannone, Ignace Loris• 2007

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Portfolio OptimizationFF49 T=60
Cumulative Wealth186.8
13
Portfolio OptimizationFF49 T=120
Cumulative Wealth143.2
13
Portfolio OptimizationFF100MEINV (T=120)
Cumulative Wealth222.3
13
Portfolio OptimizationFF49 T=60
Sharpe Ratio0.1658
13
Portfolio OptimizationFF49 T=120
Sharpe Ratio0.1581
13
Portfolio OptimizationFF25 (T=60)
Cumulative Wealth248.7
13
Portfolio OptimizationFF25EU (T=60)
Cumulative Wealth13.47
13
Portfolio OptimizationFF25 (T=60)
Sharpe Ratio0.1934
13
Portfolio OptimizationFF100MEINV (T=120)
Sharpe Ratio0.1495
13
Portfolio OptimizationFF25EU (T=120)
Cumulative Wealth3.25
13
Showing 10 of 29 rows

Other info

Follow for update