Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Global optimization via inverse distance weighting and radial basis functions

About

Global optimization problems whose objective function is expensive to evaluate can be solved effectively by recursively fitting a surrogate function to function samples and minimizing an acquisition function to generate new samples. The acquisition step trades off between seeking for a new optimization vector where the surrogate is minimum (exploitation of the surrogate) and looking for regions of the feasible space that have not yet been visited and that may potentially contain better values of the objective function (exploration of the feasible space). This paper proposes a new global optimization algorithm that uses a combination of inverse distance weighting (IDW) and radial basis functions (RBF) to construct the acquisition function. Rather arbitrary constraints that are simple to evaluate can be easily taken into account. Compared to Bayesian optimization, the proposed algorithm, that we call GLIS (GLobal minimum using Inverse distance weighting and Surrogate radial basis functions), is competitive and computationally lighter, as we show in a set of benchmark global optimization and hyperparameter tuning problems. MATLAB and Python implementations of GLIS are available at \url{http://cse.lab.imtlucca.it/~bemporad/glis}.

Alberto Bemporad• 2019

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Global OptimizationDropWave
Mean Objective Value0.691
23
Global OptimizationAdjiman function
Mean Final Optimality Gap0.627
13
Global OptimizationBohachevsky function
Mean Final Optimality Gap0.959
13
Global OptimizationBrochu function 6d
Mean Final Optimality Gap0.159
13
Global OptimizationBrochu function 2d
Mean Final Optimality Gap0.757
13
Global OptimizationDixon-Price function 2d
Mean Optimality Gap0.92
13
Global OptimizationBrochu (4d) function
Mean Final Optimality Gap0.688
13
Global OptimizationBukin function
Mean Final Optimality Gap82.9
13
Global OptimizationDixon-Price function 4d
Mean Optimality Gap0.961
13
Global OptimizationCamel hump function 3d
Mean Optimality Gap94.7
13
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update