Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective

About

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have lately received great attention thanks to their flexibility in tackling a wide range of forward and inverse problems involving partial differential equations. However, despite their noticeable empirical success, little is known about how such constrained neural networks behave during their training via gradient descent. More importantly, even less is known about why such models sometimes fail to train at all. In this work, we aim to investigate these questions through the lens of the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK); a kernel that captures the behavior of fully-connected neural networks in the infinite width limit during training via gradient descent. Specifically, we derive the NTK of PINNs and prove that, under appropriate conditions, it converges to a deterministic kernel that stays constant during training in the infinite-width limit. This allows us to analyze the training dynamics of PINNs through the lens of their limiting NTK and find a remarkable discrepancy in the convergence rate of the different loss components contributing to the total training error. To address this fundamental pathology, we propose a novel gradient descent algorithm that utilizes the eigenvalues of the NTK to adaptively calibrate the convergence rate of the total training error. Finally, we perform a series of numerical experiments to verify the correctness of our theory and the practical effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. The data and code accompanying this manuscript are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/PredictiveIntelligenceLab/PINNsNTK}.

Sifan Wang, Xinling Yu, Paris Perdikaris• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
PDE solvingHelmholtz equation
Relative L2 Error3.58
37
PDE solvingKlein-Gordon equation
Relative L2 Error0.0223
36
PDE solvingAllen-Cahn equation
L2 Relative Error0.129
25
PDE solvingDiffusion PDE
Relative L2 Error0.0014
24
PDE solvingHeat PDE
Relative L2 Error0.998
24
PDE solvingWave
Relative L2 Error0.0088
16
PDE solvingReaction PDE
Relative L2 Error4.52
16
PDE solvingConvection
Relative L2 Error0.977
14
PDE solvingWave PDE
Relative L2 Error0.0092
11
Solving PDEsBurgers Equation (test)
Max Relative L2 Error0.0358
11
Showing 10 of 29 rows

Other info

Follow for update