Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Quasi-Oracle Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

About

Flexible estimation of heterogeneous treatment effects lies at the heart of many statistical challenges, such as personalized medicine and optimal resource allocation. In this paper, we develop a general class of two-step algorithms for heterogeneous treatment effect estimation in observational studies. We first estimate marginal effects and treatment propensities in order to form an objective function that isolates the causal component of the signal. Then, we optimize this data-adaptive objective function. Our approach has several advantages over existing methods. From a practical perspective, our method is flexible and easy to use: In both steps, we can use any loss-minimization method, e.g., penalized regression, deep neural networks, or boosting; moreover, these methods can be fine-tuned by cross validation. Meanwhile, in the case of penalized kernel regression, we show that our method has a quasi-oracle property: Even if the pilot estimates for marginal effects and treatment propensities are not particularly accurate, we achieve the same error bounds as an oracle who has a priori knowledge of these two nuisance components. We implement variants of our approach based on penalized regression, kernel ridge regression, and boosting in a variety of simulation setups, and find promising performance relative to existing baselines.

Xinkun Nie, Stefan Wager• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
pancytopenia onset predictionClaims
Rate19
60
Individual Treatment Effect EstimationIHDP (within-sample)
Sqrt PEHE8.85
49
Individual Treatment Effect EstimationIHDP (out-of-sample)--
32
Treatment Effect EstimationJOBS semi-synthetic (test)
MSE5.68e-4
22
Treatment Effect EstimationRORCO semi-synthetic
MSE0.003
22
Treatment Effect EstimationNEWS semi-synthetic (test)
MSE4.37e-5
22
Treatment Effect EstimationNEWS semi-synthetic
Mean Error4.37e-5
22
Treatment Effect EstimationACIC semi-synthetic 2016 (test)
Mean Error0.0051
22
Treatment Effect EstimationACIC semi-synthetic 2017
Mean TEE Error0.005
22
Treatment Effect EstimationRORCO Real
Mean Error0.0362
22
Showing 10 of 37 rows

Other info

Follow for update