TEASER: Fast and Certifiable Point Cloud Registration
About
We propose the first fast and certifiable algorithm for the registration of two sets of 3D points in the presence of large amounts of outlier correspondences. We first reformulate the registration problem using a Truncated Least Squares (TLS) cost that is insensitive to a large fraction of spurious correspondences. Then, we provide a general graph-theoretic framework to decouple scale, rotation, and translation estimation, which allows solving in cascade for the three transformations. Despite the fact that each subproblem is still non-convex and combinatorial in nature, we show that (i) TLS scale and (component-wise) translation estimation can be solved in polynomial time via adaptive voting, (ii) TLS rotation estimation can be relaxed to a semidefinite program (SDP) and the relaxation is tight, even in the presence of extreme outlier rates, and (iii) the graph-theoretic framework allows drastic pruning of outliers by finding the maximum clique. We name the resulting algorithm TEASER (Truncated least squares Estimation And SEmidefinite Relaxation). While solving large SDP relaxations is typically slow, we develop a second fast and certifiable algorithm, named TEASER++, that uses graduated non-convexity to solve the rotation subproblem and leverages Douglas-Rachford Splitting to efficiently certify global optimality. For both algorithms, we provide theoretical bounds on the estimation errors, which are the first of their kind for robust registration problems. Moreover, we test their performance on standard, object detection, and the 3DMatch benchmarks, and show that (i) both algorithms dominate the state of the art and are robust to more than 99% outliers, (ii) TEASER++ can run in milliseconds, and (iii) TEASER++ is so robust it can also solve problems without correspondences, where it largely outperforms ICP and it is more accurate than Go-ICP while being orders of magnitude faster.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Point cloud registration | 3DMatch (test) | Registration Recall85.77 | 339 | |
| Point cloud registration | 3DLoMatch (test) | Registration Recall62.9 | 287 | |
| Point cloud registration | 3DMatch | Registration Recall (RR)85.77 | 51 | |
| Point cloud registration | KAIST Aeva → Avia | Registration Success Rate63.29 | 34 | |
| 3D Point Cloud Registration | KITTI (test) | RTE Avg (cm)12.48 | 26 | |
| Point cloud registration | 3DLoMatch (low-overlap) | Registration Recall46.76 | 18 | |
| Point cloud registration | TIERS OS128 → OS64 | Registration Success Rate62.11 | 17 | |
| Point cloud registration | TIERS OS64 → Vel16 | Registration Success Rate0.6476 | 17 | |
| Point cloud registration | KAIST Avia → Ouster | Registration Success Rate38.28 | 17 | |
| Point cloud registration | TIERS Vel16 → OS128 | Registration Success Rate27.96 | 17 |