Persistence Images: A Stable Vector Representation of Persistent Homology
About
Many datasets can be viewed as a noisy sampling of an underlying space, and tools from topological data analysis can characterize this structure for the purpose of knowledge discovery. One such tool is persistent homology, which provides a multiscale description of the homological features within a dataset. A useful representation of this homological information is a persistence diagram (PD). Efforts have been made to map PDs into spaces with additional structure valuable to machine learning tasks. We convert a PD to a finite-dimensional vector representation which we call a persistence image (PI), and prove the stability of this transformation with respect to small perturbations in the inputs. The discriminatory power of PIs is compared against existing methods, showing significant performance gains. We explore the use of PIs with vector-based machine learning tools, such as linear sparse support vector machines, which identify features containing discriminating topological information. Finally, high accuracy inference of parameter values from the dynamic output of a discrete dynamical system (the linked twist map) and a partial differential equation (the anisotropic Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation) provide a novel application of the discriminatory power of PIs.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graph Classification | MUTAG (10-fold cross-validation) | Accuracy78.8 | 236 | |
| Graph Classification | NCI1 (10-fold cross-validation) | Accuracy63 | 119 | |
| Graph Classification | ENZYMES (10-fold cross-validation) | Accuracy24.3 | 94 | |
| Binary Classification | Synthesized persistence diagrams 100 (test) | Accuracy54.5 | 32 | |
| Graph Classification | PTC MR (10-fold cross val) | Accuracy55.3 | 30 | |
| Point Cloud Classification | Synthetic Point Clouds Gaussian Noise η=0.05 | Accuracy100 | 18 | |
| Point Cloud Classification | Synthetic Point Clouds Gaussian Noise η=0.1 | Accuracy0.96 | 18 | |
| Classification | Orbit5k | Accuracy82.5 | 17 | |
| Graph Classification | COX2 (10-fold CV) | Accuracy78.7 | 13 | |
| Graph Classification | DHFR 10-fold CV | Accuracy64.3 | 13 |