Soft-Robust Algorithms for Batch Reinforcement Learning
About
In reinforcement learning, robust policies for high-stakes decision-making problems with limited data are usually computed by optimizing the percentile criterion, which minimizes the probability of a catastrophic failure. Unfortunately, such policies are typically overly conservative as the percentile criterion is non-convex, difficult to optimize, and ignores the mean performance. To overcome these shortcomings, we study the soft-robust criterion, which uses risk measures to balance the mean and percentile criterion better. In this paper, we establish the soft-robust criterion's fundamental properties, show that it is NP-hard to optimize, and propose and analyze two algorithms to approximately optimize it. Our theoretical analyses and empirical evaluations demonstrate that our algorithms compute much less conservative solutions than the existing approximate methods for optimizing the percentile-criterion.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Off-policy policy selection | Ring environment 100 batches (Evaluation) | Max Utility Difference0.84 | 8 | |
| Policy Selection | Random Frozen Lake Environment 2 | Maximum Score0.34 | 8 | |
| Policy Selection | Random Frozen Lake Environment 3 | Max Score0.36 | 8 | |
| Policy Selection | Frozen Lake Random 1 | Max Score0.32 | 8 | |
| Policy Selection | Random Frozen Lake Environment 4 | Max Performance Score0.31 | 8 | |
| Off-policy policy selection | Chain environment 100 batches (Evaluation) | Max ∆U0.55 | 8 |