Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnets

About

Deep operator networks (DeepONets) are receiving increased attention thanks to their demonstrated capability to approximate nonlinear operators between infinite-dimensional Banach spaces. However, despite their remarkable early promise, they typically require large training data-sets consisting of paired input-output observations which may be expensive to obtain, while their predictions may not be consistent with the underlying physical principles that generated the observed data. In this work, we propose a novel model class coined as physics-informed DeepONets, which introduces an effective regularization mechanism for biasing the outputs of DeepOnet models towards ensuring physical consistency. This is accomplished by leveraging automatic differentiation to impose the underlying physical laws via soft penalty constraints during model training. We demonstrate that this simple, yet remarkably effective extension can not only yield a significant improvement in the predictive accuracy of DeepOnets, but also greatly reduce the need for large training data-sets. To this end, a remarkable observation is that physics-informed DeepONets are capable of solving parametric partial differential equations (PDEs) without any paired input-output observations, except for a set of given initial or boundary conditions. We illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework through a series of comprehensive numerical studies across various types of PDEs. Strikingly, a trained physics informed DeepOnet model can predict the solution of $\mathcal{O}(10^3)$ time-dependent PDEs in a fraction of a second -- up to three orders of magnitude faster compared a conventional PDE solver. The data and code accompanying this manuscript are publicly available at \url{https://github.com/PredictiveIntelligenceLab/Physics-informed-DeepONets}.

Sifan Wang, Hanwen Wang, Paris Perdikaris• 2021

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
PDE solvingHelmholtz 1d (test)
Relative MSE0.983
15
PDE solvingDarcy-Flow 2d (test)
Relative MSE0.832
15
PDE solvingPoisson 1d (test)
Relative MSE0.143
15
PDE solvingNLRD 1d+time (test)
Relative MSE0.41
15
Learning PDE Solution OperatorsAllen-Cahn 1D
Mean L2 Relative Error2.541
12
Learning PDE Solution Operators1D Diffusion-Reaction
Mean L2 Rel Error449.1
12
PDE solvingHeat 2d+time (test)
Rel. MSE0.443
9
PDE solvingNLRDIC (test)
Relative MSE0.436
6
PDE solvingAdvections (test)
Relative MSE0.565
6
Operator learningone-dimensional Burgers' equation
Relative L2 Error (EL2)0.101
4
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update