Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Operator splitting for a homogeneous embedding of the linear complementarity problem

About

The linear complementarity problem (LCP) is a general set membership problem that includes quadratic cone programming as a special case. In this work we consider a homogeneous embedding of the LCP, which encodes both the optimality conditions of the original LCP as well as certificates of infeasibility. The resulting problem can be expressed as a monotone inclusion problem involving the sum of two maximal monotone operators, to which we apply Douglas-Rachford splitting. The resulting algorithm has almost identical per-iteration cost as applying the splitting to the LCP directly. Specifically, each iteration requires solving a linear system and projecting onto a convex cone. The resulting algorithm has no explicit hyper-parameters and is able to return a primal-dual solution should one exist or a certificate of infeasibility otherwise. If a sequence of related problems are solved it can easily be warm-started and make use of factorization caching of the linear system. We demonstrate on a range of public and synthetic datasets that for feasible problems our approach tends to be somewhat faster than applying operator splitting directly to the LCP, and in cases of infeasibility our approach can be significantly faster than alternative approaches based on diverging iterates. The algorithm we describe has been implemented in C and is available open-source as SCS-3.0.

Brendan O'Donoghue• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Combinatorial OptimizationMIS
Solution Gap (%)199.2
15
Solving Linear SDPsSDPLIB 1.2
SCS Performance0.546
13
Inference TimeMax-cut problem 50 × 50 (test)
Inference Time (s)0.042
10
Inference TimeMax-cut problem 100 × 100 (test)
Inference Time (s)0.28
10
Inference TimeMax-cut problem 150 × 150 (test)
Inference Time (s)2.092
10
Max-CutCO problems (test)
Time (sec)0.385
4
Combinatorial OptimizationMax-Cut reg (test)--
3
Combinatorial OptimizationMax. Cut
Relative Objective Gap4.547
2
Combinatorial OptimizationVertex Cover
Relative Objective Gap44.622
2
Combinatorial OptimizationMax-Clique (test)
Execution Time (s)0.642
2
Showing 10 of 18 rows

Other info

Follow for update