A Bi-Level Framework for Learning to Solve Combinatorial Optimization on Graphs
About
Combinatorial Optimization (CO) has been a long-standing challenging research topic featured by its NP-hard nature. Traditionally such problems are approximately solved with heuristic algorithms which are usually fast but may sacrifice the solution quality. Currently, machine learning for combinatorial optimization (MLCO) has become a trending research topic, but most existing MLCO methods treat CO as a single-level optimization by directly learning the end-to-end solutions, which are hard to scale up and mostly limited by the capacity of ML models given the high complexity of CO. In this paper, we propose a hybrid approach to combine the best of the two worlds, in which a bi-level framework is developed with an upper-level learning method to optimize the graph (e.g. add, delete or modify edges in a graph), fused with a lower-level heuristic algorithm solving on the optimized graph. Such a bi-level approach simplifies the learning on the original hard CO and can effectively mitigate the demand for model capacity. The experiments and results on several popular CO problems like Directed Acyclic Graph scheduling, Graph Edit Distance and Hamiltonian Cycle Problem show its effectiveness over manually designed heuristics and single-level learning methods.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Graph Edit Distance | AIDS 20-30 nodes v1 | Objective Error29.1 | 7 | |
| Graph Edit Distance | AIDS 30-50 nodes v1 | Objective Error61.1 | 7 | |
| Graph Edit Distance | AIDS 50+ nodes v1 | Objective Error77 | 7 | |
| Hamiltonian Cycle Problem | FHCP-500/600 (test) | Cycle Found Rate25 | 7 | |
| DAG scheduling | TPC-H 50 (test) | Objective Value8.91e+6 | 6 | |
| DAG scheduling | TPC-H 100 (test) | Objective Score1.52e+8 | 6 | |
| DAG scheduling | TPC-H 150 (test) | Objective Score2.24e+8 | 6 |