Neural Flows: Efficient Alternative to Neural ODEs
About
Neural ordinary differential equations describe how values change in time. This is the reason why they gained importance in modeling sequential data, especially when the observations are made at irregular intervals. In this paper we propose an alternative by directly modeling the solution curves - the flow of an ODE - with a neural network. This immediately eliminates the need for expensive numerical solvers while still maintaining the modeling capability of neural ODEs. We propose several flow architectures suitable for different applications by establishing precise conditions on when a function defines a valid flow. Apart from computational efficiency, we also provide empirical evidence of favorable generalization performance via applications in time series modeling, forecasting, and density estimation.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time Series Reconstruction | MuJoCo (test) | MSE4.217 | 51 | |
| Forecasting | MIMIC-III (test) | MSE0.477 | 43 | |
| Multivariate Time Series Classification | UEA 30% missing rate (test) | Accuracy53.1 | 39 | |
| Time-series classification | 18 UEA datasets Regular | Accuracy54.5 | 38 | |
| Irregularly Sampled Time Series Forecasting | MIMIC | MSE0.6085 | 34 | |
| Time-series classification | UEA 18 datasets 70% Missing | Accuracy43.8 | 34 | |
| Classification | Activity | Accuracy78.3 | 34 | |
| Irregularly Sampled Time Series Forecasting | Physionet 12 (test) | MSE0.326 | 28 | |
| Irregularly Sampled Time Series Forecasting | USHCN (test) | MSE0.414 | 26 | |
| Next observation prediction | PhysioNet | MSE0.4056 | 26 |