Lossy Compression for Lossless Prediction
About
Most data is automatically collected and only ever "seen" by algorithms. Yet, data compressors preserve perceptual fidelity rather than just the information needed by algorithms performing downstream tasks. In this paper, we characterize the bit-rate required to ensure high performance on all predictive tasks that are invariant under a set of transformations, such as data augmentations. Based on our theory, we design unsupervised objectives for training neural compressors. Using these objectives, we train a generic image compressor that achieves substantial rate savings (more than $1000\times$ on ImageNet) compared to JPEG on 8 datasets, without decreasing downstream classification performance.
Yann Dubois, Benjamin Bloem-Reddy, Karen Ullrich, Chris J. Maddison• 2021
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR10 (test) | Accuracy95.2 | 76 | |
| Image Classification | Cars (test) | Accuracy79.6 | 57 | |
| Image Classification | STL10 (test) | Error Rate (%)19.2 | 53 | |
| Image Classification | Food (test) | Accuracy88.3 | 50 | |
| Image Classification | Pets (test) | Accuracy89.5 | 36 | |
| Image Classification | PCam (test) | Accuracy80.9 | 20 | |
| Image Classification | Caltech (test) | Accuracy93.4 | 9 | |
| Image Classification | STL10 (test) | Accuracy Decrease0.00e+0 | 7 | |
| Image Compression | GalaxyZoo GZ2 (test) | Rate (Mb/img)0.33 | 5 | |
| Image Compression | GalaxyZoo GZ2 (val) | Rate (Mb/img)0.33 | 5 |
Showing 10 of 11 rows