Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Deep Orientation-Aware Functional Maps: Tackling Symmetry Issues in Shape Matching

About

State-of-the-art fully intrinsic networks for non-rigid shape matching often struggle to disambiguate the symmetries of the shapes leading to unstable correspondence predictions. Meanwhile, recent advances in the functional map framework allow to enforce orientation preservation using a functional representation for tangent vector field transfer, through so-called complex functional maps. Using this representation, we propose a new deep learning approach to learn orientation-aware features in a fully unsupervised setting. Our architecture is built on top of DiffusionNet, making it robust to discretization changes. Additionally, we introduce a vector field-based loss, which promotes orientation preservation without using (often unstable) extrinsic descriptors.

Nicolas Donati, Etienne Corman, Maks Ovsjanikov• 2022

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Non-isometric 3D shape matchingSMAL
Mean Geodesic Error6.7
58
Shape MatchingSHREC'19
Geodesic Error (x100)6.4
45
3D shape matchingSCAPE Anisotropic (S_a)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)2.7
35
3D shape matchingSCAPE S
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)2.6
35
3D shape matchingFAUST Anisotropic (F_a)
Mean Geodesic Error3
35
3D shape matchingFAUST (F)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)2.5
35
3D shape matchingSCAPE original (test)
Mean Geodesic Error (×100)2.6
34
3D shape matchingFAUST original (test)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)2.5
34
3D shape matchingSHREC’19 original (test)
Mean Geodesic Error6.4
24
Shape MatchingDT4D-H inter-class (test)
Mean Geodesic Error (x100)2.6
24
Showing 10 of 23 rows

Other info

Follow for update