Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Uncertainty Sets for Image Classifiers using Conformal Prediction

About

Convolutional image classifiers can achieve high predictive accuracy, but quantifying their uncertainty remains an unresolved challenge, hindering their deployment in consequential settings. Existing uncertainty quantification techniques, such as Platt scaling, attempt to calibrate the network's probability estimates, but they do not have formal guarantees. We present an algorithm that modifies any classifier to output a predictive set containing the true label with a user-specified probability, such as 90%. The algorithm is simple and fast like Platt scaling, but provides a formal finite-sample coverage guarantee for every model and dataset. Our method modifies an existing conformal prediction algorithm to give more stable predictive sets by regularizing the small scores of unlikely classes after Platt scaling. In experiments on both Imagenet and Imagenet-V2 with ResNet-152 and other classifiers, our scheme outperforms existing approaches, achieving coverage with sets that are often factors of 5 to 10 smaller than a stand-alone Platt scaling baseline.

Anastasios Angelopoulos, Stephen Bates, Jitendra Malik, Michael I. Jordan• 2020

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Conformal PredictionImageNet--
63
Conformal InferenceAverage across 15 datasets (test)
Top-1 Accuracy79.4
60
Image ClassificationUCF101
Mean Prediction Set Size2.92
54
Conformal PredictionCIFAR-100 (test)
Mean Prediction Set Size3.83
51
Conformal Prediction15 datasets (average)
Coverage90
39
Image ClassificationPets
Average Set Size1.99
36
Image ClassificationStanfordCars
Average Set Size5.42
36
Image ClassificationAircraft
Average Set Size27.58
36
Node ClassificationCoraFull (test)--
33
Conformal PredictionCIFAR-100
Avg Prediction Set Size8.6
32
Showing 10 of 84 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update