Accelerating Phase Field Simulations Through a Hybrid Adaptive Fourier Neural Operator with U-Net Backbone
About
Prolonged contact between a corrosive liquid and metal alloys can cause progressive dealloying. For such liquid-metal dealloying (LMD) process, phase field models have been developed. However, the governing equations often involve coupled non-linear partial differential equations (PDE), which are challenging to solve numerically. In particular, stiffness in the PDEs requires an extremely small time steps (e.g. $10^{-12}$ or smaller). This computational bottleneck is especially problematic when running LMD simulation until a late time horizon is required. This motivates the development of surrogate models capable of leaping forward in time, by skipping several consecutive time steps at-once. In this paper, we propose U-Shaped Adaptive Fourier Neural Operators (U-AFNO), a machine learning (ML) model inspired by recent advances in neural operator learning. U-AFNO employs U-Nets for extracting and reconstructing local features within the physical fields, and passes the latent space through a vision transformer (ViT) implemented in the Fourier space (AFNO). We use U-AFNOs to learn the dynamics mapping the field at a current time step into a later time step. We also identify global quantities of interest (QoI) describing the corrosion process (e.g. the deformation of the liquid-metal interface) and show that our proposed U-AFNO model is able to accurately predict the field dynamics, in-spite of the chaotic nature of LMD. Our model reproduces the key micro-structure statistics and QoIs with a level of accuracy on-par with the high-fidelity numerical solver. We also investigate the opportunity of using hybrid simulations, in which we alternate forward leap in time using the U-AFNO with high-fidelity time stepping. We demonstrate that while advantageous for some surrogate model design choices, our proposed U-AFNO model in fully auto-regressive settings consistently outperforms hybrid schemes.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDE Simulation | FNO V5 | L2RE (%)3.45 | 10 | |
| PDE Simulation | FNO V4 | L2 Relative Error (%)8.4 | 10 | |
| PDE Simulation | FNO V3 | L2RE (%)1.39 | 10 | |
| PDE Simulation | PB-SWE | L2RE (%)2.9 | 5 | |
| PDE Simulation | W-SWE | L2RE (%)1.29 | 5 | |
| PDE Simulation | W-SF | L2RE (%)3.89 | 5 | |
| PDE Simulation | PA-NS | L2RE (%)16.4 | 5 | |
| PDE Simulation | PA-SWE | L2RE (%)6.67 | 5 | |
| PDE Simulation | PB-CNSH | L2RE (%)4.28 | 5 | |
| PDE Simulation | W-GS | L2 Relative Error (%)3.28 | 5 |