Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Stochastic Smoothed Primal-Dual Algorithms for Nonconvex Optimization with Linear Inequality Constraints

About

We propose smoothed primal-dual algorithms for solving stochastic and smooth nonconvex optimization problems with linear inequality constraints. Our algorithms are single-loop and only require a single stochastic gradient based on one sample at each iteration. A distinguishing feature of our algorithm is that it is based on an inexact gradient descent framework for the Moreau envelope, where the gradient of the Moreau envelope is estimated using one step of a stochastic primal-dual augmented Lagrangian method. To handle inequality constraints and stochasticity, we combine the recently established global error bounds in constrained optimization with a Moreau envelope-based analysis of stochastic proximal algorithms. For obtaining $\varepsilon$-stationary points, we establish the optimal $O(\varepsilon^{-4})$ sample complexity guarantee for our algorithms and provide extensions to stochastic linear constraints. We also show how to improve this complexity to $O(\varepsilon^{-3})$ by using variance reduction and the expected smoothness assumption. Unlike existing methods, the iterations of our algorithms are free of subproblems, large batch sizes or increasing penalty parameters and use dual variable updates to ensure feasibility.

Ruichuan Huang, Jiawei Zhang, Ahmet Alacaoglu• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Stochastic pricing-inventory allocationNonconvex stochastic pricing-inventory allocation Normal setting
Reliable Rate100
10
Stochastic pricing-inventory allocationNonconvex stochastic pricing-inventory allocation (Stress setting)
Reliable Rate100
10
Stochastic energy-reserve allocationStochastic Energy-Reserve Allocation Normal (B=256, delta_tol=10^-2)
Cost5.853
10
Stochastic energy-reserve allocationStochastic Energy-Reserve Allocation Stress (B=96, delta_tol=2x10^-2)
Cost6.702
10
Fair rankingLarge-scale fair ranking (test)
NDCG@1039.73
9
Fairness-constrained classificationExperiment E1 (test)
Best Loss0.41
4
Fairness-constrained classificationExperiment E2 (test)
Best Loss0.42
4
Fairness-constrained classificationExperiment E3 (test)
Best Loss0.51
4
Fairness-constrained classificationExperiment E5 (test)
Best Loss1.13
4
Fairness-constrained classificationExperiment E4 (test)
Best Loss0.48
4
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update