Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Latent Guided Sampling for Combinatorial Optimization

About

Combinatorial Optimization problems are widespread in domains such as logistics, manufacturing, and drug discovery, yet their NP-hard nature makes them computationally challenging. Recent Neural Combinatorial Optimization (NCO) methods leverage deep learning to learn policies for constructing solutions, trained via Supervised or Reinforcement Learning. While promising, these approaches often rely on task-specific augmentations, perform poorly on out-of-distribution instances, and lack robust inference mechanisms. Moreover, existing latent space models either require labeled data or use an instance-independent latent distribution. In this work, we propose LGS-Net, a novel latent space model that conditions on problem instances, and introduce an efficient inference method, Latent Guided Sampling (LGS), based on Markov Chain Monte Carlo and Stochastic Approximation. We show that the iterations of our method form a time-inhomogeneous Markov Chain and provide rigorous theoretical convergence guarantees. Empirical results on benchmark routing tasks show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance among NCO baselines.

Sobihan Surendran, SU), Adeline Fermanian, Sylvain Le Corff, SU)• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Capacitated Vehicle Routing ProblemCVRP-200
Objective Value22.284
43
Capacitated Vehicle Routing ProblemCVRP n=125 (generalization)
Objective Value17.461
40
Traveling Salesperson ProblemTSP n=100 (train)
Objective Value7.752
36
Traveling Salesman ProblemTSP n=125 (1k instances)
Objective Value8.584
25
Combinatorial OptimizationCVRP n=100 (train)
Objective Value15.501
18
Combinatorial OptimizationCVRP Generalization n = 150
Objective Value19.229
18
Capacitated Vehicle Routing ProblemCVRP n=100 (train)
Objective Value15.524
17
Combinatorial OptimizationTSP n=100 (train)
Objective Value7.752
17
Combinatorial OptimizationTSP n=125 Generalization
Objective Value8.583
17
Combinatorial OptimizationTSP n=150 Generalization
Objective Value9.349
17
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update