Holistic Physics Solver: Learning PDEs in a Unified Spectral-Physical Space
About
Recent advances in operator learning have produced two distinct approaches for solving partial differential equations (PDEs): attention-based methods offering point-level adaptability but lacking spectral constraints, and spectral-based methods providing domain-level continuity priors but limited in local flexibility. This dichotomy has hindered the development of PDE solvers with both strong flexibility and generalization capability. This work introduces Holistic Physics Mixer (HPM), a simple framework that bridges this gap by integrating spectral and physical information in a unified space. HPM unifies both approaches as special cases while enabling more powerful spectral-physical interactions beyond either method alone. This enables HPM to inherit both the strong generalization of spectral methods and the flexibility of attention mechanisms while avoiding their respective limitations. Through extensive experiments across diverse PDE problems, we demonstrate that HPM consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both accuracy and computational efficiency, while maintaining strong generalization capabilities with limited training data and excellent zero-shot performance on unseen resolutions.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDE solving | Darcy Regular Grid (test) | Relative L2 Error0.0046 | 25 | |
| PDE solving | Navier-Stokes Regular Grid (test) | Relative L2 Error0.0734 | 25 | |
| PDE solving | Airfoil Structured Mesh (test) | Relative L2 Error0.0047 | 23 | |
| PDE solving | Pipe Structured Mesh (test) | Relative L2 Error0.003 | 23 | |
| PDE solving | Plasticity Structured Mesh (test) | Relative L2 Error8.00e-4 | 8 | |
| PDE solving | Irregular Darcy | Relative L2 Error0.736 | 5 | |
| PDE solving | Pipe Turbulence | Relative L2 Error0.826 | 5 | |
| PDE solving | Composite | Relative L2 Error0.0093 | 5 | |
| PDE solving | Heat Transfer | Relative L2 Error1.84e-4 | 4 |