Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

When few labeled target data suffice: a theory of semi-supervised domain adaptation via fine-tuning from multiple adaptive starts

About

Semi-supervised domain adaptation (SSDA) seeks to achieve accurate predictions in a target domain with limited labeled target data by exploiting abundant source and unlabeled target data. We study this problem under structural causal models (SCMs), which provide a statistical framework to describe distribution shifts between source and target domains as interventions in the data-generating process rather than ad hoc changes in model parameters. The central phenomenon is that, under low-dimensional interventions, source and unlabeled target data can help identify the high-dimensional shared structure, leaving only a low-dimensional target-specific correction to be learned from limited labeled target data. We formalize this principle for three canonical intervention models and propose the corresponding SSDA methods FT-DIP, FT-OLS-Src and FT-CIP. Under each intervention model, we demonstrate how extending an unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) method to SSDA can achieve minimax-optimal target performance with limited target labels, with the labeled-target sample complexity scaling with the intervention dimension rather than the ambient dimension. When the distribution shift is underspecified, we propose the Multi-Adaptive-Start Fine-Tuning (MASFT) algorithm, which fine-tunes from multiple adaptive starts and selects among them using a small target validation set, incurring only logarithmic overhead in the number of starts. We validate the effectiveness of our proposed methods through simulated and real data experiments.

Wooseok Ha, Yuansi Chen• 2025

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
NIR Spectroscopy RegressionCorn m5 → mp6
MSE0.02
15
NIR Spectroscopy RegressionCorn m5 → mp5
MSE0.018
15
Instrument Transfer RegressionWheat NIR B1 → B3
MSE0.188
15
NIR Spectroscopy RegressionMango Cultivar Shift 1,2,3 → 0
MSE0.619
15
NIR Spectroscopy RegressionMango Cultivar Shift 0,2,3 → 1
MSE1.398
15
RegressionCausal Chambers Light Tunnel (lt_CA)
MSE0.043
15
RegressionCausal Chambers Light Tunnel (lt_SC)
MSE0.05
15
RegressionCausal Chambers Light Tunnel lt_AW
MSE0.057
15
Target Excess Risk EstimationSynthetic linear SCMs Simulation 1: CA shift
RCA (5% Coverage)148
15
Target Excess Risk EstimationSynthetic linear SCMs Simulation 2: SC shift
Target Excess Risk (rsc=5)0.075
15
Showing 10 of 14 rows

Other info

Follow for update