Machine learning in resting-state fMRI analysis
About
Machine learning techniques have gained prominence for the analysis of resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) data. Here, we present an overview of various unsupervised and supervised machine learning applications to rs-fMRI. We present a methodical taxonomy of machine learning methods in resting-state fMRI. We identify three major divisions of unsupervised learning methods with regard to their applications to rs-fMRI, based on whether they discover principal modes of variation across space, time or population. Next, we survey the algorithms and rs-fMRI feature representations that have driven the success of supervised subject-level predictions. The goal is to provide a high-level overview of the burgeoning field of rs-fMRI from the perspective of machine learning applications.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain Disorder Classification | PPMI | Accuracy58.13 | 41 | |
| Brain Disorder Classification | ABIDE 180 (Five-fold cross-validation) | Accuracy60.75 | 18 | |
| Brain Disorder Classification | TaoWu Five-fold (cross-val) | Accuracy58.5 | 18 | |
| Brain Disorder Classification | ADNI (five-fold cross-validation) | Accuracy66.14 | 18 | |
| Brain Disorder Classification | ABIDE-240 (Five-fold cross-validation) | Accuracy53.83 | 18 | |
| Brain Disorder Classification | Neurocon | Accuracy61 | 18 | |
| Brain Disorder Classification | ABIDE-120 Five-fold (cross-val) | Accuracy53.72 | 18 | |
| Brain Disorder Classification | ABIDE-300 (Five-fold cross-val) | Accuracy54.05 | 18 | |
| Brain Disorder Classification | Mātai | Accuracy50.67 | 18 |