Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Virchow: A Million-Slide Digital Pathology Foundation Model

About

The use of artificial intelligence to enable precision medicine and decision support systems through the analysis of pathology images has the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of cancer. Such applications will depend on models' abilities to capture the diverse patterns observed in pathology images. To address this challenge, we present Virchow, a foundation model for computational pathology. Using self-supervised learning empowered by the DINOv2 algorithm, Virchow is a vision transformer model with 632 million parameters trained on 1.5 million hematoxylin and eosin stained whole slide images from diverse tissue and specimen types, which is orders of magnitude more data than previous works. The Virchow model enables the development of a pan-cancer detection system with 0.949 overall specimen-level AUC across 17 different cancer types, while also achieving 0.937 AUC on 7 rare cancer types. The Virchow model sets the state-of-the-art on the internal and external image tile level benchmarks and slide level biomarker prediction tasks. The gains in performance highlight the importance of training on massive pathology image datasets, suggesting scaling up the data and network architecture can improve the accuracy for many high-impact computational pathology applications where limited amounts of training data are available.

Eugene Vorontsov, Alican Bozkurt, Adam Casson, George Shaikovski, Michal Zelechowski, Siqi Liu, Kristen Severson, Eric Zimmermann, James Hall, Neil Tenenholtz, Nicolo Fusi, Philippe Mathieu, Alexander van Eck, Donghun Lee, Julian Viret, Eric Robert, Yi Kan Wang, Jeremy D. Kunz, Matthew C. H. Lee, Jan Bernhard, Ran A. Godrich, Gerard Oakley, Ewan Millar, Matthew Hanna, Juan Retamero, William A. Moye, Razik Yousfi, Christopher Kanan, David Klimstra, Brandon Rothrock, Thomas J. Fuchs• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Semantic segmentationGLAS
Dice86
28
Tile-level classificationPCam (test)--
19
Semantic segmentationLyNSeC 2 (Random split)
Dice Score0.12
10
Semantic segmentationBCSS (author split)
Tumor35
10
Semantic segmentationOCELOT Tissue (Random split)
Dice Score0.53
10
Tile-level classificationPanMSK (test)
Accuracy95
6
Tile-level classificationCRC (test)
Accuracy97.3
6
Tile-level classificationCRC no norm (test)
Accuracy96.8
6
Tile-level classificationMHIST (test)
Accuracy83.4
6
Tile-level classificationWILDS (test)
Accuracy97
6
Showing 10 of 13 rows

Other info

Follow for update