Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Learning High-Order Relationships of Brain Regions

About

Discovering reliable and informative relationships among brain regions from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals is essential in phenotypic predictions. Most of the current methods fail to accurately characterize those interactions because they only focus on pairwise connections and overlook the high-order relationships of brain regions. We propose that these high-order relationships should be maximally informative and minimally redundant (MIMR). However, identifying such high-order relationships is challenging and under-explored due to the exponential search space and the absence of a tractable objective. In response to this gap, we propose a novel method named HYBRID which aims to extract MIMR high-order relationships from fMRI data. HYBRID employs a CONSTRUCTOR to identify hyperedge structures, and a WEIGHTER to compute a weight for each hyperedge, which avoids searching in exponential space. HYBRID achieves the MIMR objective through an innovative information bottleneck framework named multi-head drop-bottleneck with theoretical guarantees. Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our model. Our model outperforms the state-of-the-art predictive model by an average of 11.2%, regarding the quality of hyperedges measured by CPM, a standard protocol for studying brain connections.

Weikang Qiu, Huangrui Chu, Selena Wang, Haolan Zuo, Xiaoxiao Li, Yize Zhao, Rex Ying• 2023

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Brain Disorder ClassificationADNI (five-fold cross-validation)
Accuracy86.6
38
Brain Disorder ClassificationNeurocon
Accuracy63.4
25
Brain Disorder ClassificationUCLA (Tenfold cross-validation)
Accuracy79.38
21
Brain Network ClassificationPPMI CN vs Prodromal vs PD (5-fold cross-validation)
Accuracy67.2
20
Brain Disorder ClassificationADNI Tenfold cross-validation
Accuracy71.34
18
AD ClassificationADNI CT+AMY+FDG
Accuracy86.5
16
AD ClassificationADNI CT+FDG+TAU
Accuracy85.5
16
AD ClassificationADNI AMY+FDG+TAU
Accuracy83.8
16
AD ClassificationADNI (CT+AMY+TAU)
Accuracy79.2
16
Psychiatric Diagnosis ClassificationREST-meta-MDD leave-one-site-out cross-validation rs-fMRI (test)--
13
Showing 10 of 17 rows

Other info

Follow for update