Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognition

About

Recent results indicate that the generic descriptors extracted from the convolutional neural networks are very powerful. This paper adds to the mounting evidence that this is indeed the case. We report on a series of experiments conducted for different recognition tasks using the publicly available code and model of the \overfeat network which was trained to perform object classification on ILSVRC13. We use features extracted from the \overfeat network as a generic image representation to tackle the diverse range of recognition tasks of object image classification, scene recognition, fine grained recognition, attribute detection and image retrieval applied to a diverse set of datasets. We selected these tasks and datasets as they gradually move further away from the original task and data the \overfeat network was trained to solve. Astonishingly, we report consistent superior results compared to the highly tuned state-of-the-art systems in all the visual classification tasks on various datasets. For instance retrieval it consistently outperforms low memory footprint methods except for sculptures dataset. The results are achieved using a linear SVM classifier (or $L2$ distance in case of retrieval) applied to a feature representation of size 4096 extracted from a layer in the net. The representations are further modified using simple augmentation techniques e.g. jittering. The results strongly suggest that features obtained from deep learning with convolutional nets should be the primary candidate in most visual recognition tasks.

Ali Sharif Razavian, Hossein Azizpour, Josephine Sullivan, Stefan Carlsson• 2014

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100--
622
Image ClassificationFood-101
Accuracy53.89
494
Image ClassificationDTD
Accuracy61.91
487
Image ClassificationStanford Cars
Accuracy30.61
477
Image ClassificationSUN397
Accuracy40.59
425
Image ClassificationOxford-IIIT Pets
Accuracy73.5
259
Image ClassificationCIFAR10
Accuracy86.16
240
Fine-grained Image ClassificationCUB-200 2011
Accuracy61.8
222
Image ClassificationCaltech-101
Accuracy77.53
198
Image ClassificationFGVC Aircraft
Top-1 Accuracy36.78
185
Showing 10 of 22 rows

Other info

Follow for update