Fractional Max-Pooling
About
Convolutional networks almost always incorporate some form of spatial pooling, and very often it is alpha times alpha max-pooling with alpha=2. Max-pooling act on the hidden layers of the network, reducing their size by an integer multiplicative factor alpha. The amazing by-product of discarding 75% of your data is that you build into the network a degree of invariance with respect to translations and elastic distortions. However, if you simply alternate convolutional layers with max-pooling layers, performance is limited due to the rapid reduction in spatial size, and the disjoint nature of the pooling regions. We have formulated a fractional version of max-pooling where alpha is allowed to take non-integer values. Our version of max-pooling is stochastic as there are lots of different ways of constructing suitable pooling regions. We find that our form of fractional max-pooling reduces overfitting on a variety of datasets: for instance, we improve on the state-of-the art for CIFAR-100 without even using dropout.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 (test) | -- | 3518 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 (test) | Accuracy96.53 | 3381 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | Accuracy68.55 | 691 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | Accuracy95.5 | 564 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 (test) | Error Rate3.47 | 102 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 2009 (test) | Accuracy73.61 | 53 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 Standard data augmentation (test) | Test Error27.62 | 22 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 2009 (test) | Accuracy96.53 | 12 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100 | Accuracy72.3 | 7 | |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10 | Top-1 Accuracy96.5 | 6 |