Bidirectional LSTM-CRF Models for Sequence Tagging
About
In this paper, we propose a variety of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) based models for sequence tagging. These models include LSTM networks, bidirectional LSTM (BI-LSTM) networks, LSTM with a Conditional Random Field (CRF) layer (LSTM-CRF) and bidirectional LSTM with a CRF layer (BI-LSTM-CRF). Our work is the first to apply a bidirectional LSTM CRF (denoted as BI-LSTM-CRF) model to NLP benchmark sequence tagging data sets. We show that the BI-LSTM-CRF model can efficiently use both past and future input features thanks to a bidirectional LSTM component. It can also use sentence level tag information thanks to a CRF layer. The BI-LSTM-CRF model can produce state of the art (or close to) accuracy on POS, chunking and NER data sets. In addition, it is robust and has less dependence on word embedding as compared to previous observations.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Named Entity Recognition | CoNLL 2003 (test) | F1 Score90.1 | 539 | |
| Named Entity Recognition | CoNLL English 2003 (test) | F1 Score90.1 | 135 | |
| Named Entity Recognition | CoNLL Spanish NER 2002 (test) | F1 Score80.33 | 98 | |
| Chunking | CoNLL 2000 (test) | F1 Score94.46 | 88 | |
| Named Entity Recognition | CoNLL Dutch 2002 (test) | F1 Score79.87 | 87 | |
| Named Entity Recognition | Conll 2003 | F1 Score90.1 | 86 | |
| Named Entity Recognition | CoNLL German 2003 (test) | F1 Score73.42 | 78 | |
| Part-of-Speech Tagging | Penn Treebank (test) | Accuracy97.55 | 64 | |
| Named Entity Recognition | MSRA (test) | F1 Score88.81 | 63 | |
| Named Entity Recognition | OntoNotes 4.0 (test) | F1 Score64.3 | 55 |