Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Label Distribution Learning

About

Although multi-label learning can deal with many problems with label ambiguity, it does not fit some real applications well where the overall distribution of the importance of the labels matters. This paper proposes a novel learning paradigm named \emph{label distribution learning} (LDL) for such kind of applications. The label distribution covers a certain number of labels, representing the degree to which each label describes the instance. LDL is a more general learning framework which includes both single-label and multi-label learning as its special cases. This paper proposes six working LDL algorithms in three ways: problem transformation, algorithm adaptation, and specialized algorithm design. In order to compare the performance of the LDL algorithms, six representative and diverse evaluation measures are selected via a clustering analysis, and the first batch of label distribution datasets are collected and made publicly available. Experimental results on one artificial and fifteen real-world datasets show clear advantages of the specialized algorithms, which indicates the importance of special design for the characteristics of the LDL problem.

Xin Geng• 2014

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Age EstimationMORPH S2 (Setting II)
MAE3.94
38
Age EstimationFG-NET (test)
MAE18.25
24
Emotion Distribution LearningDMER subject-independent (test)
Chebyshev Distance0.107
22
Visual Emotion Distribution LearningTwitter_LDL (test)
Chebyshev Distance0.28
14
Emotion Distribution LearningWESAD subject-independent (test)
Chebyshev Distance0.0471
11
Emotion Distribution LearningWESAD (subject-independent)
Chebyshev Distance0.0471
11
Visual Emotion Distribution LearningAbstract Paintings
Chebyshev Distance0.245
8
ClassificationICIAR (test)
Mean Absolute Error0.49
7
Age EstimationAFAD-Lite (test)
MAE5.03
7
ClassificationHCI (test)
MAE1
7
Showing 10 of 19 rows

Other info

Follow for update