Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

RIGA at SemEval-2016 Task 8: Impact of Smatch Extensions and Character-Level Neural Translation on AMR Parsing Accuracy

About

Two extensions to the AMR smatch scoring script are presented. The first extension com-bines the smatch scoring script with the C6.0 rule-based classifier to produce a human-readable report on the error patterns frequency observed in the scored AMR graphs. This first extension results in 4% gain over the state-of-art CAMR baseline parser by adding to it a manually crafted wrapper fixing the identified CAMR parser errors. The second extension combines a per-sentence smatch with an en-semble method for selecting the best AMR graph among the set of AMR graphs for the same sentence. This second modification au-tomatically yields further 0.4% gain when ap-plied to outputs of two nondeterministic AMR parsers: a CAMR+wrapper parser and a novel character-level neural translation AMR parser. For AMR parsing task the character-level neural translation attains surprising 7% gain over the carefully optimized word-level neural translation. Overall, we achieve smatch F1=62% on the SemEval-2016 official scor-ing set and F1=67% on the LDC2015E86 test set.

Guntis Barzdins, Didzis Gosko• 2016

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
AMR parsingLDC2017T10 AMR 2.0 (test)
Smatch85.93
168
AMR parsingAMR 3.0 (test)
SMATCH83.8
45
AMR parsingLDC2015E86 (test)
F1 Score43
21
AMR parsingNew3
Smatch75.87
8
AMR parsingLittle Prince
Smatch79.21
8
AMR parsingBio
Smatch62.05
8
Showing 6 of 6 rows

Other info

Follow for update