Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networks

About

We introduce a new representation learning approach for domain adaptation, in which data at training and test time come from similar but different distributions. Our approach is directly inspired by the theory on domain adaptation suggesting that, for effective domain transfer to be achieved, predictions must be made based on features that cannot discriminate between the training (source) and test (target) domains. The approach implements this idea in the context of neural network architectures that are trained on labeled data from the source domain and unlabeled data from the target domain (no labeled target-domain data is necessary). As the training progresses, the approach promotes the emergence of features that are (i) discriminative for the main learning task on the source domain and (ii) indiscriminate with respect to the shift between the domains. We show that this adaptation behaviour can be achieved in almost any feed-forward model by augmenting it with few standard layers and a new gradient reversal layer. The resulting augmented architecture can be trained using standard backpropagation and stochastic gradient descent, and can thus be implemented with little effort using any of the deep learning packages. We demonstrate the success of our approach for two distinct classification problems (document sentiment analysis and image classification), where state-of-the-art domain adaptation performance on standard benchmarks is achieved. We also validate the approach for descriptor learning task in the context of person re-identification application.

Yaroslav Ganin, Evgeniya Ustinova, Hana Ajakan, Pascal Germain, Hugo Larochelle, Fran\c{c}ois Laviolette, Mario Marchand, Victor Lempitsky• 2015

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Node ClassificationCora
Accuracy92.4
1215
Image ClassificationMNIST
Accuracy87.33
417
Unsupervised Domain AdaptationOffice-Home (test)
Average Accuracy72.4
332
Image ClassificationOffice-31
Average Accuracy82.7
308
Image ClassificationPACS (test)
Average Accuracy81
271
Crowd CountingShanghaiTech Part A (test)
MAE118.7
271
Unsupervised Domain AdaptationOffice-Home
Average Accuracy72.4
250
Image ClassificationPACS
Overall Average Accuracy68.3
241
Domain GeneralizationVLCS
Accuracy80.8
238
Domain GeneralizationPACS
Accuracy84.6
231
Showing 10 of 553 rows
...

Other info

Follow for update