Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Domain Separation Networks

About

The cost of large scale data collection and annotation often makes the application of machine learning algorithms to new tasks or datasets prohibitively expensive. One approach circumventing this cost is training models on synthetic data where annotations are provided automatically. Despite their appeal, such models often fail to generalize from synthetic to real images, necessitating domain adaptation algorithms to manipulate these models before they can be successfully applied. Existing approaches focus either on mapping representations from one domain to the other, or on learning to extract features that are invariant to the domain from which they were extracted. However, by focusing only on creating a mapping or shared representation between the two domains, they ignore the individual characteristics of each domain. We suggest that explicitly modeling what is unique to each domain can improve a model's ability to extract domain-invariant features. Inspired by work on private-shared component analysis, we explicitly learn to extract image representations that are partitioned into two subspaces: one component which is private to each domain and one which is shared across domains. Our model is trained not only to perform the task we care about in the source domain, but also to use the partitioned representation to reconstruct the images from both domains. Our novel architecture results in a model that outperforms the state-of-the-art on a range of unsupervised domain adaptation scenarios and additionally produces visualizations of the private and shared representations enabling interpretation of the domain adaptation process.

Konstantinos Bousmalis, George Trigeorgis, Nathan Silberman, Dilip Krishnan, Dumitru Erhan• 2016

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationOffice-31
Average Accuracy79.2
308
Image ClassificationPACS (test)
Average Accuracy67.4
271
Image ClassificationPACS
Overall Average Accuracy67.4
241
Domain GeneralizationPACS
Accuracy67.33
231
Domain GeneralizationPACS (test)
Average Accuracy67.3
225
object recognitionPACS (leave-one-domain-out)--
112
Domain AdaptationVisDA 2017 (test)
Mean Class Accuracy82.4
98
Image ClassificationPACS v1 (test)
Average Accuracy67.4
92
Image ClassificationMNIST -> USPS (test)
Accuracy91.3
79
Image ClassificationOffice-10 + Caltech-10
Average Accuracy86.81
77
Showing 10 of 46 rows

Other info

Code

Follow for update