Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

TI-POOLING: transformation-invariant pooling for feature learning in Convolutional Neural Networks

About

In this paper we present a deep neural network topology that incorporates a simple to implement transformation invariant pooling operator (TI-POOLING). This operator is able to efficiently handle prior knowledge on nuisance variations in the data, such as rotation or scale changes. Most current methods usually make use of dataset augmentation to address this issue, but this requires larger number of model parameters and more training data, and results in significantly increased training time and larger chance of under- or overfitting. The main reason for these drawbacks is that the learned model needs to capture adequate features for all the possible transformations of the input. On the other hand, we formulate features in convolutional neural networks to be transformation-invariant. We achieve that using parallel siamese architectures for the considered transformation set and applying the TI-POOLING operator on their outputs before the fully-connected layers. We show that this topology internally finds the most optimal "canonical" instance of the input image for training and therefore limits the redundancy in learned features. This more efficient use of training data results in better performance on popular benchmark datasets with smaller number of parameters when comparing to standard convolutional neural networks with dataset augmentation and to other baselines.

Dmitry Laptev, Nikolay Savinov, Joachim M. Buhmann, Marc Pollefeys• 2016

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image ClassificationMNIST (test)
Accuracy83
654
Image ClassificationEMNIST (test)
Accuracy44.2
272
Image ClassificationMNIST rotated (test)
Test Error (%)1.2
105
Object ClassificationModelNet10 (test)
Accuracy47.7
80
Image ClassificationMNIST original (test)--
46
Image ClassificationMNIST transformed (test)
Accuracy49.8
10
Image ClassificationEMNIST transformed (test)
Accuracy17.2
10
Image ClassificationTU-Berlin (test)
Accuracy18.9
9
Image ClassificationTU Berlin transformed (test)
Accuracy8.2
9
Showing 9 of 9 rows

Other info

Follow for update