Share your thoughts, 1 month free Claude Pro on usSee more
WorkDL logo mark

Perceptual Quality Prediction on Authentically Distorted Images Using a Bag of Features Approach

About

Current top-performing blind perceptual image quality prediction models are generally trained on legacy databases of human quality opinion scores on synthetically distorted images. Therefore they learn image features that effectively predict human visual quality judgments of inauthentic, and usually isolated (single) distortions. However, real-world images usually contain complex, composite mixtures of multiple distortions. We study the perceptually relevant natural scene statistics of such authentically distorted images, in different color spaces and transform domains. We propose a bag of feature-maps approach which avoids assumptions about the type of distortion(s) contained in an image, focusing instead on capturing consistencies, or departures therefrom, of the statistics of real world images. Using a large database of authentically distorted images, human opinions of them, and bags of features computed on them, we train a regressor to conduct image quality prediction. We demonstrate the competence of the features towards improving automatic perceptual quality prediction by testing a learned algorithm using them on a benchmark legacy database as well as on a newly introduced distortion-realistic resource called the LIVE In the Wild Image Quality Challenge Database. We extensively evaluate the perceptual quality prediction model and algorithm and show that it is able to achieve good quality prediction power that is better than other leading models.

Deepti Ghadiyaram, Alan C. Bovik• 2016

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image Quality AssessmentSPAQ
SRCC0.819
250
Video Quality AssessmentKoNViD-1k
SROCC0.7472
183
Image Quality AssessmentCSIQ
SRC0.722
150
Image Quality AssessmentTID 2013 (test)
Mean SRCC0.68
134
No-Reference Image Quality AssessmentKADID-10K
SROCC0.301
115
No-Reference Image Quality AssessmentKonIQ-10k
SROCC0.668
111
No-Reference Image Quality AssessmentTID 2013
SRCC0.315
105
Image Quality AssessmentCSIQ (test)
SRCC0.835
103
Image Quality AssessmentLIVE
SRC0.879
96
Image Quality AssessmentTID 2013
SRC0.463
74
Showing 10 of 27 rows

Other info

Follow for update