Shape Interaction Matrix Revisited and Robustified: Efficient Subspace Clustering with Corrupted and Incomplete Data
About
The Shape Interaction Matrix (SIM) is one of the earliest approaches to performing subspace clustering (i.e., separating points drawn from a union of subspaces). In this paper, we revisit the SIM and reveal its connections to several recent subspace clustering methods. Our analysis lets us derive a simple, yet effective algorithm to robustify the SIM and make it applicable to realistic scenarios where the data is corrupted by noise. We justify our method by intuitive examples and the matrix perturbation theory. We then show how this approach can be extended to handle missing data, thus yielding an efficient and general subspace clustering algorithm. We demonstrate the benefits of our approach over state-of-the-art subspace clustering methods on several challenging motion segmentation and face clustering problems, where the data includes corrupted and missing measurements.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motion Segmentation | Hopkins 155 3-motion sequences | Mean Clustering Error (%)1.77 | 45 | |
| Motion Segmentation | Hopkins 155 (all sequences) | Mean Clustering Error1.01 | 45 | |
| Motion Segmentation | Hopkins 155 2-motion sequences | Classification Error0.0078 | 31 | |
| Motion Segmentation | Hopkins 12 | Avg Classification Error0.61 | 20 | |
| Motion Segmentation | Indoor Dataset Pencils sequence 1.0 (test) | Misclassification Error0.2307 | 6 | |
| Motion Segmentation | Indoor Dataset Penguin sequence 1.0 (test) | Misclassification Error0.415 | 6 | |
| Motion Segmentation | Indoor Dataset Flowers sequence 1.0 (test) | Error (%)14.2 | 6 | |
| Motion Segmentation | Indoor Dataset Bag sequence 1.0 (test) | Misclassification Error (%)34.55 | 6 | |
| Motion Segmentation | Indoor Dataset Bears sequence 1.0 (test) | Error Rate49.48 | 6 |