Simple Does It: Weakly Supervised Instance and Semantic Segmentation
About
Semantic labelling and instance segmentation are two tasks that require particularly costly annotations. Starting from weak supervision in the form of bounding box detection annotations, we propose a new approach that does not require modification of the segmentation training procedure. We show that when carefully designing the input labels from given bounding boxes, even a single round of training is enough to improve over previously reported weakly supervised results. Overall, our weak supervision approach reaches ~95% of the quality of the fully supervised model, both for semantic labelling and instance segmentation.
Anna Khoreva, Rodrigo Benenson, Jan Hosang, Matthias Hein, Bernt Schiele• 2016
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Semantic segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 (val) | Mean IoU74.2 | 2040 | |
| Semantic segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 (test) | mIoU67.5 | 1342 | |
| Semantic segmentation | PASCAL VOC (val) | mIoU77.7 | 338 | |
| Instance Segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 (val) | mAP @0.544.8 | 173 | |
| Weakly supervised semantic segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 (test) | mIoU67.5 | 158 | |
| Weakly supervised semantic segmentation | PASCAL VOC 2012 (val) | mIoU65.7 | 154 | |
| Instance Segmentation | COCO non-VOC categories | mAP19.7 | 41 | |
| Instance Segmentation | PASCAL VOC (val) | AP@0.5044.8 | 24 | |
| Weakly supervised semantic segmentation | VOC 2012 (val) | mIoU65.7 | 19 | |
| Instance Segmentation | VOC 2012 (val) | AP^r @ IoU=0.546.4 | 13 |
Showing 10 of 12 rows