Learning a No-Reference Quality Metric for Single-Image Super-Resolution
About
Numerous single-image super-resolution algorithms have been proposed in the literature, but few studies address the problem of performance evaluation based on visual perception. While most super-resolution images are evaluated by fullreference metrics, the effectiveness is not clear and the required ground-truth images are not always available in practice. To address these problems, we conduct human subject studies using a large set of super-resolution images and propose a no-reference metric learned from visual perceptual scores. Specifically, we design three types of low-level statistical features in both spatial and frequency domains to quantify super-resolved artifacts, and learn a two-stage regression model to predict the quality scores of super-resolution images without referring to ground-truth images. Extensive experimental results show that the proposed metric is effective and efficient to assess the quality of super-resolution images based on human perception.
Related benchmarks
| Task | Dataset | Result | Rank | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Quality Assessment | PIPAL NTIRE 2021 IQA Challenge (test) | PLCC0.203 | 32 | |
| Image Quality Assessment | PIPAL NTIRE 2022 IQA Challenge (test) | SROCC0.173 | 30 | |
| Image Quality Assessment | PIPAL NTIRE 2022 (val) | SROCC0.129 | 29 | |
| Image Quality Assessment | IQA Lego, Toy, Faces, Yarn, QRs, Text, Car, Mira (test) | Lego Score47 | 15 | |
| Image Quality Assessment | RealSRQ | PLCC0.145 | 11 | |
| Image Quality Assessment | SR dataset (BP) | Spearman Correlation0.967 | 7 | |
| No-Reference Image Quality Assessment | Large-scale SR dataset Bicubic | Spearman Correlation0.933 | 7 | |
| No-Reference Image Quality Assessment | Large-scale SR dataset Shan08 | Spearman Correlation0.891 | 7 | |
| No-Reference Image Quality Assessment | Large-scale SR dataset Glasner09 | Spearman Correlation0.931 | 7 | |
| No-Reference Image Quality Assessment | Large-scale SR dataset Yang10 | Spearman Correlation0.968 | 7 |