Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

PlaNet - Photo Geolocation with Convolutional Neural Networks

About

Is it possible to build a system to determine the location where a photo was taken using just its pixels? In general, the problem seems exceptionally difficult: it is trivial to construct situations where no location can be inferred. Yet images often contain informative cues such as landmarks, weather patterns, vegetation, road markings, and architectural details, which in combination may allow one to determine an approximate location and occasionally an exact location. Websites such as GeoGuessr and View from your Window suggest that humans are relatively good at integrating these cues to geolocate images, especially en-masse. In computer vision, the photo geolocation problem is usually approached using image retrieval methods. In contrast, we pose the problem as one of classification by subdividing the surface of the earth into thousands of multi-scale geographic cells, and train a deep network using millions of geotagged images. While previous approaches only recognize landmarks or perform approximate matching using global image descriptors, our model is able to use and integrate multiple visible cues. We show that the resulting model, called PlaNet, outperforms previous approaches and even attains superhuman levels of accuracy in some cases. Moreover, we extend our model to photo albums by combining it with a long short-term memory (LSTM) architecture. By learning to exploit temporal coherence to geolocate uncertain photos, we demonstrate that this model achieves a 50% performance improvement over the single-image model.

Tobias Weyand, Ilya Kostrikov, James Philbin• 2016

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Image GeolocalizationIM2GPS3K (test)
Success Rate (25km)24.8
93
Image GeolocalizationYFCC4K (test)
Success Rate (Region, 200km)22.2
71
Image GeolocationIm2GPS (test)
Success Rate (Country 750km)64.6
50
Image RetrievalHolidays standard (test)
mAP89.9
25
Image GeolocalizationIM2GPS
Success Rate @ 1 km (Street)8.4
14
Image GeolocalizationIm2GPS3k
Success Rate @ 1 km8.5
13
Geolocational accuracyYFCC26k (test)
Success Rate (Street 1km)4.4
10
Visual GeolocationIm2GPS3k
Success Rate @ 1km8.5
10
Image GeolocalizationIM2GPS n=237 (test)
Success Rate @ 25km (City)24.5
5
Image GeolocalizationYFCC26k
Success Rate @ 1 km (Street)4.4
5
Showing 10 of 11 rows

Other info

Follow for update