Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptation

About

Adversarial learning methods are a promising approach to training robust deep networks, and can generate complex samples across diverse domains. They also can improve recognition despite the presence of domain shift or dataset bias: several adversarial approaches to unsupervised domain adaptation have recently been introduced, which reduce the difference between the training and test domain distributions and thus improve generalization performance. Prior generative approaches show compelling visualizations, but are not optimal on discriminative tasks and can be limited to smaller shifts. Prior discriminative approaches could handle larger domain shifts, but imposed tied weights on the model and did not exploit a GAN-based loss. We first outline a novel generalized framework for adversarial adaptation, which subsumes recent state-of-the-art approaches as special cases, and we use this generalized view to better relate the prior approaches. We propose a previously unexplored instance of our general framework which combines discriminative modeling, untied weight sharing, and a GAN loss, which we call Adversarial Discriminative Domain Adaptation (ADDA). We show that ADDA is more effective yet considerably simpler than competing domain-adversarial methods, and demonstrate the promise of our approach by exceeding state-of-the-art unsupervised adaptation results on standard cross-domain digit classification tasks and a new more difficult cross-modality object classification task.

Eric Tzeng, Judy Hoffman, Kate Saenko, Trevor Darrell• 2017

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Domain AdaptationOffice-31
Accuracy (A -> W)94.6
156
Object DetectionWatercolor2k (test)
mAP (Overall)49.8
113
Domain AdaptationOffice-Home
Average Accuracy62.8
111
Partial Domain AdaptationOffice-Home
Average Accuracy62.8
97
Image ClassificationOffice-31 (test)
Avg Accuracy87
93
Image ClassificationSVHN to MNIST (test)
Accuracy76
66
Image ClassificationMNIST -> USPS (test)
Accuracy89.4
64
Image ClassificationUSPS -> MNIST (test)
Accuracy90.1
63
Object DetectionComic2k (test)
mAP23.8
62
3D Semantic SegmentationSemanticKITTI (val)
mIoU22.8
54
Showing 10 of 45 rows

Other info

Follow for update