Our new X account is live! Follow @wizwand_team for updates
WorkDL logo mark

Learning To Score Olympic Events

About

Estimating action quality, the process of assigning a "score" to the execution of an action, is crucial in areas such as sports and health care. Unlike action recognition, which has millions of examples to learn from, the action quality datasets that are currently available are small -- typically comprised of only a few hundred samples. This work presents three frameworks for evaluating Olympic sports which utilize spatiotemporal features learned using 3D convolutional neural networks (C3D) and perform score regression with i) SVR, ii) LSTM, and iii) LSTM followed by SVR. An efficient training mechanism for the limited data scenarios is presented for clip-based training with LSTM. The proposed systems show significant improvement over existing quality assessment approaches on the task of predicting scores of Olympic events {diving, vault, figure skating}. While the SVR-based frameworks yield better results, LSTM-based frameworks are more natural for describing an action and can be used for improvement feedback.

Paritosh Parmar, Brendan Tran Morris• 2016

Related benchmarks

TaskDatasetResultRank
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQA (test)
Spearman Correlation84.89
29
Action Quality AssessmentAQA-7 (test)
Diving79.02
29
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQA
Spearman Correlation0.8489
22
Action Quality AssessmentJIGSAWS
Correlation (Suturing)0.34
20
Action AssessmentMIT-Skating
Spearman Correlation0.602
15
Action AssessmentRhythmic Gymnastics
Score (Ball)47.1
11
Action Quality AssessmentFineDiving-HM (test)
Spearman Correlation0.6969
9
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQA v1 (test)
Spearman Correlation84.89
7
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-NAE
Spearman's Rho0.849
7
Action Quality AssessmentFineGym NAE
Spearman Correlation (ρ)0.641
7
Showing 10 of 10 rows

Other info

Follow for update